h4831sc - An Overview
h4831sc - An Overview
Blog Article
This is speculated to be the "head to" powder-or darn close to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It is actually the foundation for numerous pet loads, still I haven't been satisfied with the effects.
They are really precisely the same detail, but H4831 sc is Lower shorter so it can pack right into a case less complicated then the conventional, and sometimes like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us to add a lot more powder then just the conventional H4831.
The obvious trigger is often a tough/ruff bore. No amount of copper fouling minimizing brokers within the powder will suitable this.
Along with the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me excellent teams and excellent velocity, but Rottweil R905 has a noticeably better velocity and supplies marginally much better precision. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos from the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally improved. For that reason, in Each and every of such cases I went with An additional powder, but I will surely detest to divest myself in the H4831.
Thornton, CO Provide of H4831SC is starting to dwindle down far too so get what you'll need on your new load I might suggest. Could possibly be all of very little whenever they restock all the things shortly but All those powders are owning transport regulation problems.
Did you at any time consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with conventional chamber. Wanting to know what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Any individual loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the results, any data you'll be able to share? Should also mention I have some ELD-X h4831sc load data one hundred seventy five's I wish to exam out, When you have data on that too.
Like stated over, exact same things. All of that is different is the size of your kernels. I did hear someplace that they're going to only make the SC Later on. I do not know if that is legitimate or not but would seem sensible to me. I take advantage of SC since which is what I located in the eight lb jug and it really works.
At present working with IMR 4831 inside a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a h4831sc well-liked option for this caliber and yields a little more velocity. Apart from it staying short Lower, what on earth is the difference in these two powders, and should I swap to H4831sc?
Why would I mention h4831sc load data this? Precisely what is my point? I am unsure that there is a authentic valid level apart from what's popular with most hasn't been well-liked with me at all in these situation. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or something? Only to provide you with how crazy I really am, tomorrow I'm assortment tests a close friends new .
Run your load up with the precise powder (sc or normal) and ton you might be applying even though. Exact burn up amount doesn't mean it's going to behave "accurately" the same. I've viewed more than one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp lots of H4831.
It is really very likely that no more discussion is needed, where scenario we advise beginning a different thread. If on the other hand you're feeling your response is needed you are able to still accomplish that.
arkansas or ohio i in no way observed a variance other than the regular is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are various. Where by you will be complicated it and believing that it truly is close is H4831 and H4831SC are certainly equivalent. Individuals two are pretty much the identical apart from H4831SC is created to more compact grains so it meters easier.